
Are We Detecting Enough Deep Vein Thrombosis/Pulmonary Embolism?
Dear Editor,
Few common medical conditions are as difficult to diagnose as pulmonary embolism. As many as 80% of patients with pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis identified during the postmortem examination are not clinically suspected of having the condition before they die. 1-3 In addition, both deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism manifest few specific signs and symptoms, and there are well-recognized problems with the accuracy of current imaging modalities for detecting venous thromboembolism.
In the last issue of the Archives of Iranian Medicine, Nikparvar Fard, et al., in their article"pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in northern Iran", 4 in a chart review, solely based on discharge diagnosis, have identified some patients with venous thromboembolism and gave a hospital incidence of 9/10,000. Considering the poor methodology used, how one can rely on this very underestimated incidence, compare it with the results of other reports, and assess the validity of the presented risk factors?
F. Habibzadeh, M.D,
NIOC Outpatients Polyclinics,
Shiraz, Iran.
References
Authors reply
Dear Editor,
We welcome the letter on "pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis in northern Iran" by F.Habibzadeh As we mentioned in our article "because the signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are nonspecific and may be confused with a variety of other cardiopulmonary disorders, presenting in a similar way, the total incidence and mortality rates of VTE are still uncertain."1,2 The objective of our study was to determine the hospital incidence and case fatality rates of diagnosed cases of VTE in Imam Hospital.
All the comparisons made were with the methodologicaly same studies.3-9 Therefore, our comment on the lower incidence of VTE in Iran than Western countries is logical. Although this study, like all other retrospective studies on diagnosed cases of VTE, may underestimate the incidence rate of VTE, but other results including risk factors and demographic characteristics of patients are essentialy unchanged.
A decent methodology must be in accordance with the objective of the study. It was unfair to label our study as poor methodology merely because it was a retrospective medical records review, while most of notable studies on the epidemiology of VTE used the same methodology. If we were to determine the total incidence of the diagnosed, undiagnosed, and silent episodes10 of VTE in the hospital, we whould plan another methology, which, in that case, to our knowledge, will be unique and uncomparable to other studies.
M. Nikparvar Fard MD,
Tehran, Iran
Reference